Message Forum


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

12/23/18 12:09 PM #3773    

 

Stephen (Steve) Dixon

Merry Christmas - Happy Holidays - Seasons Greetings - Namaste - 最良好的祝愿 - Maligayang Pagbati - τις καλύτερες ευχές μου - Mazel Tov - Bestu Kveðjur - ご多幸を祈る - Geriausi Linkėjimai - بهترین آرزوها - Muitas Felicidades - Наилучшие пожелания - Mejores Deseos - BÄSTA LYCKÖNSKNINGAR - En Içten Dileklerimle -

To my friends of all faiths, and of little or none. You all matter…


12/24/18 01:45 AM #3774    

 

Philip Spiess

Dave:  I agree with Ann:  Love the dog!  And I don't think you're excommunicated -- on the contrary, you've communicated!

Dixon:  What you said!  (Oh, may I add, in true Cincinnati echt-Deutsch fashion, "Froeliche Weihnachten!)

Ochs:  Did I ever tell you about my meeting with Dickens' great-grandson, Cedric Dickens, in Philadelphia, and his giving me his great-grandfather's recipe for "Flaming Bishop"?  ("Light up a bowl, Bob Crachit!")


12/24/18 10:02 AM #3775    

 

Paul Simons

A bit more irreverent, satirical holiday content in case anyone missed it - 

https://youtu.be/2e1lXW1QHBo

 


12/27/18 11:59 PM #3776    

 

Philip Spiess

Seasoned Greetings, all:

If you gag on the saccharine amenities and sentimentalities of the season, if you cringe at the faux-hearty jollifications of the many among you at this time of year, if you're simply wracked out by the hustle and bustle of the holidays' manifold vivifications and frivolities (or if the current political climate, on either side of the proverbial "Aisle," is bumming you out), take a moment in this tide in the affairs of men (oh, golly! I better mention women, too!) to ferret out and stick your nose into John Updike's little Yuletide tome (1993), The Twelve Terrors of Christmas (as suitably illustrated by Edward Gorey).  It will rejuvenate your spirit, and you will bless him that giveth the writing and him that recommendeth the work, and your soul will magnify the coming of a new year.  Let the excessive decorations of the day fall down like mighty waters, to relieve an overburdened landscape, and, in that newly denuded world of "Tiny Trim," let us all say, "God Bless Us, Everyone!" (and the Dickens with the rest of you!).  -- Spiess


12/28/18 01:05 PM #3777    

 

Barbara Kahn (Tepper)

Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, Happy New Year and thanks to Phil Spiess for keeping this board going. 


12/29/18 02:38 PM #3778    

Thomas Lounds Jr.

Yes, Barbara, we all thank Phillip and all the other contributors for keeping us going. Back on the WHHS train, I am somewhat amazed at the liberal use these days of split infinitives. I feel our English teachers at Walnut would be appalled at the use of this technique "to better serve us" . Perhaps, they would also " take us down a grade" at the ease with which we invent new words these days such as "enthused" as an adjective or " prioritize" instead "set priorities". Perhaps I am being too strict but it seems to me it was that kind of discipline that helped to make so many of you successful. What say you?

12/30/18 02:18 PM #3779    

 

Barbara Kahn (Tepper)

Mr. Lounds, I am googling as I watch football so not giving the subject my full attention but I'm surprised to see this question of split infinitives has been around since the 19th century. There are differing opinions on the usage but there seems to be no hard and fast rule against it.

 
"Contrary to what some grammarians say, there is no rule against using split infinitives in English. One might use them with care, but splitting an infinitive is sometimes the best way to clearly express a thought."
 
"The only logical reason to avoid splitting infinitives is that there are still a lot of people who mistakenly think it is wrong."
 
To change the order of words sometimes will change the meaning so use it sparingly when you want to convey a certain connotation? What's the answer Mr. Lounds (Tom)?
 
 
 
 

12/30/18 06:59 PM #3780    

 

Philip Spiess

Not to interrupt (which is to say, "split") the latest flow of thought here (is half a heaven a "split infinity"?), but on the eve of New Year's Eve it seems incumbent upon us to review and remember the dubious and meteoric career of Cincinnatian George Remus, who made a "splash," shall we say, on the Cincinnati scene in the 1920s.

Background:  George Remus, born in Berlin in 1874, moved with his family to Chicago at the age of five.  By the age of fourteen, he was working in his uncle's pharmacy to help support his family, and by nineteen he had graduated from the Chicago College of Pharmacy and was a certified pharmacist; by the age of twenty-one, he had bought the pharmacy, and shortly thereafter he expanded the business.  In other words, he was a young man who knew how to mix up "medical" things in jars and bottles.

However, Remus then attended the Illinois College of Law, and by 1904 he was a practicing lawyer, being admitted that year to the Illinois Bar.  In this capacity, he gave evidence of the turns his future career would take by specializing in defending criminals, especially those accused of murder.  He became very good at this, indeed famous, earning vast sums in the process.  He was, in short, successful and wealthy -- and a Chicagoan.

The Story:  But then Fate took a hand in Remus's future proceedings:  national Prohibition of alcoholic spirits reared its ugly head in the United States as the states ratified the 18th Amendment and the related statutes came into law as the Volstead Act.  When Prohibition officially began on January 17, 1920, Remus, ever astute, noticed that his criminal clients were getting quickly wealthy in the illicit liquor trade, and he decided to get in on the game himself, using his excellent knowledge of the law to keep himself out of trouble.  He memorized the Volstead Act word for word and studied those loopholes whereby he could purchase pharmacies (under his pharmacist's license) and distilleries to sell "bonded" liquor to himself under government licenses for medicinal purposes.  His employees would then steal his own liquor from him so he could sell it illegally (at much higher profits than just selling it for medicinal purposes).  But Chicago's gangsters, allied with Al Capone, began crowding him out of the business.

It is at this point that George Remus moved to Cincinnati, away from the gangs of Chicago:  he had discovered that 80% of America's bonded whiskey was located within a 300-mile radius of "the Queen City" (if you studied 8th-grade Social Studies with Mr. Meredith, you learned that the 19th-century Cincinnati brewing and distilling industries were the direct result of tri-state corn production, which, in turn, was also the fodder by which Cincinnati became "Porkopolis"; if you didn't study with him, think Kentucky Bourbon production and National Distillers and Cincinnati's breweries -- described on this site at Post #3114 -- and Lawrenceburg, Indiana, home of Seagrams, now MGP Industries).  After arriving in this lush alcoholic paradise, Remus proceeded to buy up most of the whiskey manufacturers.  In three years, Remus had accrued $40 million, working with his trusted assistant, George Conners, and he owned many of America's most famous distilleries, including Fleishmann's, a purchase which included 3,100 gallons of whiskey.

George Remus then settled into Cincinnati for the long haul (so to speak, given his trucking requirements):  he purchased Death Valley Farm, located in the Western Hills, from George Gehrum, and quickly developed a home and fortified distillery there.  To all appearances (this was the 1920s, after all), the farm was accessible only by a dirt road, but the actual distillery was located at 2656 Queen City Avenue.  The alcohol was first distilled on the top floor of Remus's home (sometimes described as "the attic"); then it was carried by a dumb-waiter to the basement, where a trap door led to a tunnel 50-100 feet long and six feet below ground.  Remus's bootlegger employees would move the finished product down the tunnel to a waiting car, whence it lit out for sales sites and speak-easies further afield.  Thus other area communities, such as Newport, Kentucky, began the illicit serving of alcohol at the small -- and secret -- gambling casinos which opened up with that purpose in mind.  Tradition says that Remus's Death Valley Farm was the only location in the Cincinnati area to be secret enough not to be raided by the Feds, although a raid by rival hijackers of liquor took place in 1920, but Remus's armed guards, led by John Gehrum, ran them off with a heavy volley of gunfire. 

Thus, in a quick amount of time, George Remus earned the epithet, "King of the Bootleggers."  He and his second wife, Imogene (Remus's daughter by his first wife Lillian, Romola Remus, played Dorothy Gale in Hollywood's 1910 first-ever filming of The Wizard of Oz), threw lavish parties for the Cincinnati elite at his Western Hills mansion, nicknamed "the Marble Palace."  In 1922, for example, one hundred couples were invited, the men receiving diamond stickpins as gifts and their wives receiving brand-new cars; in 1923 each female guest received a brand-new Pontiac.

But Wait!  There's More!:  But now Fate enters the picture once again:  by 1925, Remus's schemes for beating and defrauding the government started to turn sour; he was indicted for thousands of violations of the Volstead Act and was convicted by a jury that took under two hours to reach its conclusion.  He was given a two-year federal prison sentence, which he served in the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary.  While in prison, Remus confided to another inmate that his wife Imogene had control of his money.  The inmate happened to be an undercover Prohibition agent named Franklin Dodge.  Instead of reporting this information to the government, Dodge resigned his job and began an affair with Remus's wife.  Dodge and Imogene liquidated Remus's fortune and hid as much of the money as possible; they even tried to have old George deported, and, that failing, they tried to hire a hit man for $15,000 to rub him out.  Thoughtful as always, Imogene gave her imprisoned husband a mere $100 of the multi-million-dollar nest-egg that he had created.  She then filed for divorce.

By this time, 1927, George Remus was out of jail, and, on the way to court to finalize the divorce, Remus directed his driver to chase the cab carrying Imogene and her daughter through Eden Park, finally forcing it off of the road.  Remus jumped out and fatally shot Imogene in the abdomen in front of that well-known Eden Park landmark, the Spring House Gazebo.  At Remus's trial for murder, the prosecutor in the case was Charles P. Taft II, son of the former President and Chief Justice, and later mayor of Cincinnati; Remus defended himself, pleading temporary insanity, and the jury deliberated only nineteen minutes before acquitting him.  The State of Ohio then tried to commit Remus to an insane asylum, since the jury had found him insane, but the prosecutors had defeated themselves by their previous claim that he could stand trial for murder because he was not insane.

End of Story:  After all of this brouhaha, George Remus lived out the rest of his life quietly in Covington, Kentucky; he died in 1952, and is buried with his third wife, Blanche, in Riverside Cemetery in Falmouth, Kentucky.  He was known by friends and associates as always referring to himself in the third person.  Having purportedly met George Remus in a Louisville hotel and having been captivated by his larger-than-life personality, F. Scott Fitzgerald supposedly (according to some) based his character of Jay Gatsby in his novel The Great Gatsby (1925) on Cincinnati's own George Remus.

You just can't make these things up.  [Example of Barbara Kahn Tepper's caveat on split infinitives?]


12/31/18 09:40 AM #3781    

 

Chuck Cole

Concerning split infinitives--an important example that helped us move towards greater use of split infinitives comes from Star Trek, which 50 years ago proclaimed as part of the Enterprise's mission

TO BOLDLY GO WHERE NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE.

In the second Star Trek series, The Next Generation, it became

TO BOLDLY GO WHERE NO ONE HAS GONE BEFORE

 


12/31/18 12:52 PM #3782    

 

Nancy Messer

Phil - you tell the best stories.  I know this wasn't a "story" but you tell them in a way that is fun to read.  Don't stop.


12/31/18 01:17 PM #3783    

 

Nancy Messer

Here are some words and phrases that came in to being after our WHHS days or after exposure to the ways the general public speaks.  I dislike all of them.

 

     grow the business

     clueless

     warsh

     I'm not for sure

 

This one relates to directions for eyedrops you get from the pharmacy.

     Instill one drop in both eyes daily.

    It should be - Instill one drop in each eye daily.  (The 2 eyes aren't sharing the same drop.)

 

Other things that have occurred over the years.

People don't know how to calculate making correct change to someone making a purchase.

People don't know how to read a clock.

Schools aren't teaching cursive (I remember it as "script").

 

I never knew how to use a slide rule or an abacus.  Learning to use an abacus would be interesting.

 

 


12/31/18 02:15 PM #3784    

 

Barbara Kahn (Tepper)

Nancy, there is at least one more word that annoys me - Congrats. Is it too much trouble to say Congratulations? 


12/31/18 04:16 PM #3785    

 

Nancy Messer

I agree.


01/01/19 12:48 PM #3786    

 

Susan Patterson (Schramm)

“Opps, sorry about that.”  Should  be eliminated from use forever!


01/01/19 08:28 PM #3787    

 

Jerry Ochs

My pet peeve is the use of nouns as verbs. 

He will attempt to summit Mt. Everest. 

She hopes to medal in the Olympics.

Pet peeve number two: "The rocket will launch at noon" in place of "be launched".

My sons say I am a fussbudget, language changes.


01/01/19 10:06 PM #3788    

 

Philip Spiess

Jerry:  Please correct your sons.  As near as I can tell, the Congress is a "fussbudget"; you are a curmudgeon.

Mr. Lounds:  I have found, over the years, that I often split infinitives, usually with the (sometimes) intentional object of emphasizing the adverb that appears in the middle of the split (cf. Barbara Kahn Tepper's caveat); other times, when I notice the computer is pointing out my "error" to me, I will correct it (if I'm not emphasizing anything).  Either way, I tend to write the way I speak (when I'm speaking formally).

But now to my current linguistic pet peeves:  the words "simplistic" and "fulsome."  It makes my gorge rise to hear numerous supposedly erudite commentators on TV use both of these words quite incorrectly, certainly within the past year (may it rest in peace!).  "Simplistic" is used invariably in place of "simple" or "simply," when what it means really (notice I'm dodging a split infinitive there) is "tending to oversimplify an issue or problem by ignoring complexities or complications."  Likewise, I hear "fulsome" being used by people who should know better (such as former federal prosecutors) to mean "full" or "fullness," when what it means is 180-degrees opposite (or more):  "offensively excessive or insincere" or "offensive to the senses; loathsome; disgusting."  (Thus they will say, "When Robert Mueller issues his final report, I hope it will be fulsome in its details."  No, they don't mean that!)  [Note to the folks who monitor this Forum and keep it going:  this is not an ill-advised political commentary on my part; this is a discussion of some language used in the current parlance of the media.]

Uh, Nancy, what is "warsh" (just bad pronunciation?)?  As to cursive, because the Fairfax County, Virginia, Public Schools were no longer teaching cursive writing, my sister Barbara (WHHS '63) and my niece began teaching it at night at our church for anyone who wanted to learn it; it was a very popular course.  And then some years ago our church's Assistant Pastor, who happened to be pregnant for the first time, was giving a report to our Session on "growing the church" (in hers and the then current phrase).  My tongue-in-cheek comment was (as you may guess), "I see you're doing your part to 'grow the church.'"


01/02/19 12:48 PM #3789    

 

Gail Weintraub (Stern)

I'll chime in....my pet grammatical peeves: me/I and who/that. These are so often interchanged incorrectly.

Happy and Healthy 2019! Hoping to see many of you at our 75th/.75/3/4 Birthday Reunion in June, 2021 in Cincinnati. Date TBD.


01/02/19 01:10 PM #3790    

 

Ira Goldberg

Phil, I believe F. Scott Fitzgerald stayed and imbibed at the Seelbach Hotel in Louisville. At least, it’s history claims he did. However, a short walk to the Brown Hotel provided another fine venue in which to drink heartily. Perhaps he bent an elbow there with Thomas Merton, who frequented that establishment. Everyone, may 2019 provide good health and great joy to you and your loved ones. Gail, thanks for notice of our ,75 celebration. See you all in 2021, if not sooner. 


01/02/19 01:18 PM #3791    

 

Judy Holtzer (Knopf)

Hi everyone. Here is the View from Abroad on the Matter of the Decline of the English Language....

I am much like Janus on this topic, since although I worked as an English editor (mostly English medical editing) at Ben Gurion University for many years in several departments, I have still lived in a non-English-speaking country for 50 years so that when speaking, at times I will recall the Hebrew word rather than the English one when speaking English, and the English word rather than the Hebrew when speaking Hebrew. However, this is a topic that engages my attention, since I have always loved English, so here goes.

It's often painful listening to English-speaking TV programs. Downton Abbey may have been marvelous for the attention to dress, food and whatnot appropriate for the period, but I seriously doubt if the now-popular phrase "reach out" was used in 1920 in upper-class Britain. There were other anachronisms of speech made that made me blink rapidly, but I cannot recall them just now. Confessing that I watch the Property Brothers Drew and Jonathan Scott is difficult for me, but I need to comment that I want to scream every time I hear the words "massive" and "tons of storage" falling from the brothers' lips, since they seem quite well-educated and voluble for their age. In general and among the masses on TV, "amazing" and "awesome" set my teeth on edge. Get these people a Thesaurus!

When I shop online at Ebay and get messages from the seller, I am often completely perplexed. Recently, there was a very nice lady from the UK who wrote incomprehensible messages, but I have encountered many others from the States who were equally hard to understand. 

Now comes to mind the much-published cardiologist in the department where I edited papers before they were submitted to medical journals. Before I continue, I have to explain that Israelis are quite geographically discriminatory in nature automatically, even after knowing a person for years. In this case, the Much-Published One was from an elite area of Tel Aviv, while I was a lowly resident of Beer Sheva. He wrote about an experiment in which tissue was grown "ex vivo". Excuse me? "Ex vivo"? What does that mean? It could be said that it has so many meanings as to have no meaning at all. I earnestly attempted to use logic with him to explain just this point, but logic with a snobbish physician is a lost cause. He showed me a previous paper where another scientist had gotten away with using "ex vivo" in a paper that was published in the same journal to which he was submitting, so logic flitted out the window.

Please pardon my passion (not to mention the alliteration). The cardiological assault took place nearly twenty years ago, but still rankles. I dare not dwell on what this divulges about me, including the urge toward alliteration.

I must share the good news I got from the pet hospital just now. My 16 year old puppy who has been my primary companion since he was 3 months old was diagnosed with pancreatitis, and not mestatasis of the adrenal invasive cancer diagnosed some months ago. The cancer is inoperable at his age, so when he suddenly could not get up or walk on his own, and seemed to be failing in front of me, I thought that this was it. I am so thrilled that the vet thinks that they can treat the pancreatitis and resulting pain, and that he can have at least a few more fairly comfortable months that I had to share. BG is a mostly terrier mutt, and the smartest, most playful dog I have ever had, and I have had quite a few. He is also the last dog I will have, since I have been physically unable to take care of a dog as needed. I cannot expect my caretaker to take on a new dog after having had to not only walk my BG, but also diaper the poor thing in these last few months. I will definitely be the poorer for having to be without a dog. Begging everyone to forgive my splits!

 


01/02/19 06:56 PM #3792    

 

Philip Spiess

Ira!     Funny that tonight you should mention the Seelbach Hotel (my favorite Louisville hotel, because of its Rookwood Room in the basement) -- I happen to be drinking a Seelbach Cocktail, which was created at the Seelbach Hotel in 1917, so it's a pre-Prohibition cocktail, which puts it in a league of its own.  (It is often claimed that the Old-Fashioned cocktail, possibly the oldest cocktail around, was created at the Pendennis Club in Louisville, but this is not true; however, the Pendennis Cocktail, a very respectable drink, was created there.)  The recipe for the Seelbach Cocktail was lost during Prohibition, and it was only rediscovered by the hotel's restaurant director in 1995, who served the cocktail but kept the recipe secret.  Finally the hotel released the recipe for publication in 1997.  [P.S.:  J. Graham Brown, of Louisville's Brown Hotel, built the Brown Student Center at Hanover College in Indiana, my alma mater and that of seven of your other Walnut Hills classmates; it opened in the Fall of 1967, just in time for our senior year.]  


01/04/19 11:28 AM #3793    

 

Larry Klein

How joyous (tongue in cheek) that so many of my classmates remember the effective use of infinitives, or even the definition of infinitive.  I barely remember noun, verb, adjective, and adverb.  Parsing was never one of my favorite activities.  However, in honor of  the class of '64, henceforth, when playing golf, I shall name each of the fairways "Infinitive - One thru Eighteen" and subsequently resolve to "split" every single one of them.

Happy New Year 2019 to all and I hope you all are looking forward to reuning in 2021 as much as I am.


01/05/19 12:37 AM #3794    

 

Philip Spiess

Larry:  "To Infinitive, and beyond!"


01/05/19 11:03 AM #3795    

 

Judy Holtzer (Knopf)

Larry: 

"Reuning in 2021" . I love it!!!

I could barely believe my ears when an Israeli vet at the veterinary hospital treating my very sick 16 year old dog used - and pronounced - correctly the word "exacerbate". I must say that I was impressed at this from a vet. I would have been impressed to hear this from an M.D. here in Israel, even though most speak an acceptable English. 

Do you (with pets) think you would hear the word exacerbate from your vet? Just curious, George. 


01/05/19 01:38 PM #3796    

 

Stephen Collett

Does anyone have experience in getting a DNA profile? Like sending in your stuff and getting a history of your DNA? Any advice appreciated.


01/05/19 04:55 PM #3797    

 

Jerry Ochs


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page